1. Can inevitable discovery, as set forth by This Court in
Nix V. Williams, be proven through the testimony of a
detective not actively involved in the investigation?

2. Should the exclusionary rule be applied when police violate
a suspect's Constitutional Rights no less than twenty-five
times in one continuous interrogation?

3. Are police free to disregard a suspect's Constitutional
Rights when in pursuit of evidence?

Whether the exclusionary rule applies when police violate a suspect's Constitutional Rights multiple times during a continuous interrogation, and whether inevitable discovery can be proven through testimony of a non-involved detective