Whether, in light of this Court's decision in Esteras v. United States, 145 S. Ct. 2031 (2025) and in order to maintain uniform application of this Court's precedent, the Court should grant, vacate, and remand, because the district court considered, contrary to Esteras, the retributive factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2)(A)—such as promoting respect for the law—when revoking or modifying a term of supervised release under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)?

Whether the Court should grant, vacate, and remand because the district court improperly considered retributive factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2)(A) when revoking or modifying a term of supervised release under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)