1. Do a Pro Se litigant have constitutional provision in federal court? Violation of the 5th and 14th Amendments, "Due process clause". Ensures that the federal government does not deprive individuals of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. This means fair notice and a meaningful opportunity to be heard. Violations occur if courts act arbitrarily or unfairly. Eminent domain clause: The government can't take property without providing just compensation.

2. Did the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals rely on the two audio tapes associated with the case, and the Docketing Statement? Along with the appellant brief and reply briefs to render the decision? Court error, the reason for accepting the appeal Wisconsin violated the due process clause. (Also, the court never rude on the discrimination and retaliation case, (error). "Medical Proof overlooked: see Appendix, page 46". Proof No accidents Appendix page 38.

3. Does Gina M. Colletti, Clerk of Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin, have the authority to disregard exhibits submitted for the record? Incorrect imaging, and two copies of the same documents? error. 18 USC 2076,18 USC 2071 (a)(b). Due Process Clause. See Case 21-CV-654, Filed 12/01/22, See double copies page 24, and 25 of 322, Document 28. No accidents on my report. See double copies Page 256, and Page 257 of 322, Document 28.

4. Another SUBTRACTION, that proves I was cleared federally to drive tractor trailers. See page 198 of 322, Document 28.(THIS IS A IMAGE OF A STICKY TAB ). VALUABLE DOCUMENT MISSING. SEE APPENDIX, PAGE 40. Also, see Appendix 45 and 47. (CONDITIONS: REPORT ALL ACCIDENTS AND SUSPENSIONS, TO SPE). SHALL BE REPORTED IN WRITING TO ISSUING, AGENCY BY THE EMPLOYING MOTOR CARRIER. NOTES: 09-2017. CAN'T PROVIDE THAT I DID A ROAD TEST.

5. Does Ursa, have a reason for termination other than the Discrimination Complaint 202000290? See, Page 34 of 322, (Through) Page 39 of 322, Document 28. Appendix page 39. SECOND reason for termination, FMLA Complaint 202100393. See, Page 52 of 322,( Through) Page 59 of 322, Document 28. Doctor Ali, greated a month off work". Followed by 8 hours a day M-F, for 2 months. June 14th to August 14,2019 OFF DUTY. Ursa, DID NOT GIVE ME 48 DAYS OFF WORK.

6. Is this a PRETEXTUAL cover-up for DISCRIMINATION and RETALIATION. In addition to, FMLA INTERFERENCE. Maybe this is why Lower Court, did not rule on the Discrimination and RETALIATION? See Appendix page 24 and 31. Seventh circuit have the power to rule on a pretextual defense.

7. Why on 08-21-19, The day of termination Ursa, called Police to remove me from the premises. Page 30 (Through)33 of 322, Document 28). The start of Retaliation.

8. Does Ursa, have a

Do Pro Se litigants have constitutional protections in federal court under the Due Process Clause?