No. 25-546
Julia Mae Robinson v. United States, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: appellate-procedure civil-procedure constitutional-standards federal-law judicial-review monetary-relief
Latest Conference:
2026-01-09
Question Presented (from Petition)
Why didn't The Northern District and The Appeals for The Eleventh Circuit court in Atlanta Georgia follow and properly apply The law, The Constitution, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, and properly apply evidence turned into by The Plaintiff/Appellant to The Plaintiff/Appellant case in both courts listed above?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Eleventh Circuit and Northern District of Georgia courts improperly applied federal law and constitutional standards in denying monetary relief
Docket Entries
2026-02-05
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2026-01-12
Petition DENIED.
2025-12-12
Waiver of right of respondent T-Mobile USA, Inc. to respond filed.
2025-12-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
2025-12-05
Waiver of Federal Respondents of right to respond submitted.
2025-12-05
Waiver of right of respondent Federal Respondents to respond filed.
2025-12-04
Waiver of right of respondent Apple Inc. to respond filed.
2025-11-20
Waiver of right of respondent Florida Atlantic University to respond filed.
2025-01-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 5, 2025)
Attorneys
Apple Inc.
Katia Asche — ArentFox Schiff LLP, Respondent
Federal Respondents
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
Florida Atlantic University
Christopher Sutter — Florida Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Julia Mae Robinson
Julia Mae Robinson — Petitioner
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Jay Edward Heidrick — Polsinelli PC, Respondent