(1) Was the novel state procedural ground for denying the false evidence claims in the initial habeas application inadequate?

(2) Was the state procedural ground dismissing the subsequent application independent of federal law when it required an applicant to make a prima facie case for relief on the underlying federal claim?

(3) Whether Mr. Jenkins's Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated due to the cumulative presentation of false evidence at his capital trial?

Whether the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals improperly applied a novel procedural bar to deny a habeas corpus petition alleging false testimony in a capital murder case