1. Was there "insufficient evidence" presented by the United States to convict Spila of money laundering conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(B)(i) ? Specifically, whether 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(B)(i) required the United States to prove that Spila and/or his co -conspirators had knowledge that the proceeds used in the alleged money laundering conspiracy came from a felony as opposed to an y type of unlawful source as determined by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Spila contends that the United States failed to present evidence that Spila and/or his co -conspirators had knowledge that the underlying proceeds came from a crime that constitutes a felon y.

Whether 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(B)(i) requires proof of knowledge that proceeds originated from a specific felony crime