Does cl iHValiJ usurer ot Counsel hearing and no access to fke. Courts, don^ aJ+k etker ~
pcetrid violations o'? Conrhtutiond rigkts 5cJ Compulsory prote-SSy C/glvt to an cfaoff&y owd
tkfirCi^kt to organiie. cuid present cv defense /Make- fke ewhre trfal {anda/jienfdly unfair?

>■ occur culyen a,jnd^&ct ' ffoSe^ol^enda^IS deniedary
, .Opportunity to pre-pare dricl organ R-e Ai6 defense } deny/n^-fl/m I^S $tk,6tk and /4fk
OiiMenc/meMt tfgkfe to due ^ro€&$s o'f tke Icmv, e^aj jjfoted/on o^jh& lau/aAcl cl■pour trial?

petitioners plea? 4or access to fke mmi/nam took tkd Ou indict fro 5e (Je'fzncii^t
fteeds Q,nd kas <J/ OdMstituf/onai rigkt defied access to le$d /nder/al 1 l^a\
^advi$De/ofjani.zatioAy 1l«^ib»WHWtp»l'fcee pjwne access and access to the- Court
Coad aypiWec/_Djfed^Ay^ea/j Aferney //ie^fedju& for /yiorin^ oil fke- issues pre-
Sen/tec/ abo^jdenying petd/oner "Adrprou-^ Qnd tkej^^^jOppe/^Andy to u/4i
an Ae, werih_of tf$ claim? and cvtiec/
adkontie? ?

Does the denial of access to legal materials and court resources fundamentally violate a criminal defendant's constitutional rights to due process, effective counsel, and a fair trial?