Did the Court of Appeals erroneously define what constitutes substantial burden upon religious practice and did it erroneously find impermissible bindings of fact and weighing of evidence at Summary judgment?

Does a prisoner have a free Speech honesty criticize, PFR n employees being corrupt and is the Mvock rix Insolence vague or evenly troadrigVA Io?

III. Should tye Supreme personal involvement tA\93 clotty/?Counl define, requirement toner properly 1 active remedies»$ available

Does the Court of Appeals erroneously define what constitutes a substantial burden upon religious practice and did it make erroneous and impermissible findings of fact and weighing of evidence at summary judgment?