Did Court abuse discretion by Not agreeing With Fact that, at Juvenile Lifer appellant's Resentencing iN 2ol8, pesenten cing gudge Yecanted the only Feasod he claimed he denied aecerthfyMg appellant re juvensle System fh 1 PPE because itwas proven false, thus any sentence or coNWy Ctr ON Sard Charges MM aAANT ErsNal system P$ iflegal, uACoAStH tutfonal, null anda void ie a th A,WS Lou + Abuse diScretion by Fos! ing to Find the Onn CocaMmes/MarijUanan Addicted Court appointed a berner(Robect Barbar) was Me fF eechve/prejudiced Ppellant by maltiously/ 1 Sely Stating m senyence Memorandum thatappetlant does not deny being gui ity Without appellant's Knowledge oc con ent, despite Knowing that appellant always stated(and the ew Aeace proved) . hers fymecent of att Chargese .

3B. Did court abuse discretion by failing to find that Tocane/mMacry daria iuiddicte dt atrorrney Robert Barbars) Was inefFective/y7reju diced appellant py requesting Ao to C0 yéar gentedce in Sentence Memeorandum ~ Without appeMant's Knowledge or consent, #heh agamst oppellaats ~e peated Objections wt Resentencing Hearing f

7, Did couct abuse discretion by failing to Find thatthe cocame/marijuana g ddrcted at tomey (Robert Bar boto> Was ineffective by with hotarag documents and Tetusittg Fo communicate With appellant about Cases ee

5, Did court abuse discretion by foiling to TIRE that the Cocame/mornijuana addrcted aptorney (Borbato) Was ineFCect ve secre Ad by making | Negahve ,Faise, tnd msiea AsAg StabremMen*+S Against appellant im Sentence Meno Fandum and ony revirewmg and agreeing With porrions of apeéianhs Prison File Provided by Prosecut/on ana ~ POOSecuT ions Negative, FalSe, and misleading interpretation o=& 7+ T | oe co,

6.Did court abuse discretion by Fribsag to find thot € ecame/marijUuana addicted attoeney oe CBar bate) Uras jNeFEective For not Obj<ctiKng , TO Prosecntrom's Megotive, FalSe, ang mislead <ng Co (PT! u dre ray Stayements in Sentence ME Moran dun, and actions and Statements af Resenten Chg e

Z4PAS pouct Abuse discretion by Farag te Fina nat Cocame /mocijuata addicted attorney @orbayo) . WES Ne F Fective/erred by compiling ond. Submit ting incomplete MAigation evaluotion and repott wth negative, Falsqand misleading jnformmation Knowingly Fo |

8, Did Couct avuSe disccetion by Failing to Find that CocaMe/

Did the court abuse discretion by not addressing ineffective assistance of counsel claims against attorney Barbato and by failing to find his drug addiction impaired his legal representation