1. Whether a state court's prolonged failure to rule on timely filed child support modification and
enforcement motions —despite irrefutable financial documentation, statutory entitlements, and
procedural compliance —constitutes a violation of due process under the Fourteenth
Amendment.

2. Whether state court Judicial officers and court-appointed agents, who knowingly deny a
domestic violence survivor access to her awarded property (home proceeds, retirement, and
child support), can be held liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for actions taken under the color of law.

3. Whether denial of relief based on jurisdictional misstatements by a court commissioner acting
without stipulation violates fundamental fairness and justifies a change of venue under federal
due process standards.

4. Whether the Court should clarify that First Amendment protections prohibit retaliatory labeling
of a litigant as "vexatious " for challenging judicial misconduct and requesting enforcement of
orders already entered.

5. Whether California 's Anti-SLAPP statute, CCP § 425.16, and U.S. Supreme Court precedent
require priority review of motions designed to protect petitioners from retaliatory litigation when
lower courts delay or ignore such motions.

Whether a state court's prolonged failure to rule on timely filed child support modification and enforcement motions violates due process under the Fourteenth Amendment