No. 25-5190
Curtis Dickerson v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: co-conspirators expert-testimony fourth-circuit hearsay insufficient-evidence monetary-forfeiture
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2025-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. Whether the Fourth Circuit erred by dismissing Mr. Dickerson's appeal, where the District Court improperly entered a $2,400,000.00 Order of Monetary Forfeiture based on insufficient evidence consisting of hearsay from felons and co-conspirators, speculation, guesswork, and "extrapolations" from so-called experts and Government witnesses?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fourth Circuit erred by dismissing Mr. Dickerson's appeal where the District Court improperly entered a $2,400,000.00 Order of Monetary Forfeiture based on insufficient evidence
Docket Entries
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-08-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-07-30
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-07-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-07-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 25, 2025)
Attorneys
Curtis Dickerson
Peter L. Goldman — Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent