1. Were the Petitioner 's Constitutional Amendment Rights violated when
petitioner 's Rule 60(B) motion was denied yet, the Northern District court of
Appealsstated:
"However, contrary to the district courts determination, "Widmyer [also]
could properly challenge the District court 's finding of procedural default in a
Rule 60(B) motion. Explaining that a movant Rule 60(B) does not raise "a
new habeas corpus claim, or attack Q the federal courts previous denial of the
claim on the merits, when he 'merely asserts that a previous Ruling which
precluded a merits determination, " such as" a denial for...procedural default,
"was erroneous. Accordingly, the district court erred by declining to consider
that argument under Rule 60(B).

2. Is there a Autonomy Right to assert claims in a Habeas proceeding,
where under the state habeas statues, 1 "both " the "habeas petitioner, "
and habeas counsel have to raise all claims.
If this is obstructed does this obstruction rebut the
presumption of correctness under § 2254 (e) (1)?

Whether a Rule 60(B) motion challenging procedural default in a habeas corpus proceeding violates constitutional rights when state and federal court errors obstruct claim presentation