1. Whether a court should only look at the "four corners" of the plea agreement language when determining whether a breach of the plea agreement occurred; as opposed to also looking at circumstances and events outside of the four corners that are relevant to the reasonable understanding and expectations of the agreement?

2. Weather the Fifth Circuit's newly established "four corners" doctrine, led to a deprivation of due process of the Petitioner because a reasonable person in his position would have thought the plea agreement for his drug case covered his conduct surrounding a sex trafficking case?

Whether a court should only look at the 'four corners' of the plea agreement language when determining whether a breach occurred, or should also consider circumstances and events outside the agreement that are relevant to the reasonable understanding and expectations of the parties?