Whether the Department of General Services Government Claims Program, in failing to process and provide notice of filed government claims in compliance with the California Government Claims Act, Code of Civil Procedure § 910 et seq., violates the Fourteenth Amendment due process clause according to the principles enunciated in Leis v. Flynt, 439 U.S. 438 (1979)?

Based on such service failures, deprivation of multiple personal property interests grounded in California Civil Code § 753, does the state have a duty to afford the due process procedural safeguards mandated by Matthews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976)?

Under the Government Claims Act, does the Department of General Services Government Claims Program have a duty to process and notify state and county offices of claims filed against them, reporting (i) such violations of due process standards set forth in Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970); (ii) deprivations of entitlements grounded in federal law (42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2003); 42 C.F.R. §§ 1.2200(a)(5)(ii))?

Does any statute exist under Gonzaga University v. Doe, 536 U.S. 273 (2002), in order for petitioner to compel performance of such duties?

Does the writ of general government claims program engage in a continuing pattern of action violating due process clause by failing to process a properly filed government claim?

Does the Department of General Services Government Claims Program cause

Does the Office of General Services' Government Claims Program violate due process by failing to process mental health claims filed by petitioner?