1. Whether due process is violated when state courts rely
on a concealed ex parte proceeding and fraudulent
allegations —previously adjudicated as lacking
competent evidence —fail to correct the record or
adjudicate core claims, thereby denying Petitioners a
meaningful hearing and issuing void rulings.

2. Whether courts may ignore sworn admissions holding
the State of Arizona liable for injuries to Marcella and
her parents, and disregard the precedent of earlier court
judgments, without violating due process?

3. Whether claim preclusion may bar a minor 's
independent claims where she was not permitted to
proceed in her own name, indispensable parties were
absent, and newly discovered evidence shows fraud on
the court and due process violations?

4. Whether a state court may summarily deny review
under Ariz. R. Civ. P. 22(f), without factual findings,
and refuse to adjudicate a Rule 60(b) motion alleging
fraud on the court and jurisdictional defects —despite
settled precedent that such motions are not time-
barred —without violating the Due Process Clause of
the Fourteenth Amendment?

Whether due process is violated when state courts rely on a concealed ex parte proceeding and fraudulent allegations previously adjudicated as lacking competent evidence, fail to correct the record or adjudicate core claims, thereby denying Petitioners a meaningful hearing and issuing void rulings