Lawrence J. Turner v. Wisconsin
Whether, in assessing direct-review counsel's performance based upon the omission of a preserved issue, lower courts should either apply the clearly stronger test, which compares exclusively the relative strengths of presented and omitted issues, or apply a reasonableness test that incorporates factors such as counsel's experience, judgment, and motivations?
Whether, in assessing direct-review counsel's performance based upon the omission of a preserved issue, lower courts should either apply the clearly stronger test, which compares exclusively the relative strengths of presented and omitted issues, or apply a reasonableness test that incorporates factors such as counsel's experience, judgment, and motivations?