No. 25-5068

Dwayne Anderson v. Ohio

Lower Court: Ohio
Docketed: 2025-07-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: bill-of-particulars constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment
Latest Conference: 2025-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Was Dwayne Anderson 's right to be informed of the nature and cause of the
accusation against him violated when the state failed to provide him a bill of
particulars upon his request?

2. Was Dwayne Anderson's right to due process of law under the Fifth and
Fourteenth Amendments violated when the Ohio Court of Appealsaffirmed his
conviction despite Anderson requesting a bill of particulars, not receiving one in
contravention of Ohio law, and showing prejudice as a result of the state 's failure?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was Dwayne Anderson's right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation against him violated when the state failed to provide him a bill of particulars upon his request, and was his right to due process of law under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments violated when the Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction despite showing prejudice?

Docket Entries

2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-08-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-06-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 8, 2025)

Attorneys

Dwayne Anderson
Dwayne Anderson — Petitioner