Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether an individual's probation or supervised release status categorically strips them of Second Amendment protection under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), or whether courts must apply Bruen's historical analysis to determine if the specific predicate offense historically justified disarmament, as required by the Fifth Circuit's decision in United States v. Diaz?
2. Is the lifetime ban on possession of firearms by all felons, codified at 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), plainly unconstitutional on its face under Bruen because it is permanent and applies to all persons convicted of felonies?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified.
Docket Entries
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-07-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-07-15
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-07-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-06-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 7, 2025)
Attorneys
Kristian Darnell Moore
Dustin Talbot — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
Moez Mansoor Kaba — Hueston Hennigan LLP, Respondent