On the Court?
h&i/n pufoLfair o (ObioHn^j
^l/iroi/tgki Frau J on Fko (Lourp
ar^FalsoL^r^oiAWnf diAo- to
Conecuh,^ej/icJ&jAc-c^anJ pJE>orn/ fp pAufy j^. bbb^F'T or Jun
s nartfty rOflAuiOUS dui 1^ piuin pruvis/oos bt r!<(0PK
mtlnaui- ZxplciMaJion, (aren't- preceJe^f or WS,
C_. . .Sitr/l n/xn / „.. . r>rf- s'- r J P \ ' _ f >v Z\ ' . . ■'Iihe. He^p d^/rPe. C^r US H7j) -for
A.rh'oU ofth&UP Q
1 i s> tk tho. preo~oqa t,
o-p ^(/'rpe^ncob uA J
'^/dctS af&~t& bfO'pfbvibAi t

Whether the district court's denial of habeas corpus relief based on alleged procedural violations and false evidence constitutes a violation of due process rights