1. Whether the near consensus determination by the various Circuits to accept appeal waivers in plea agreements that extend to subsequent sentencing proceedings violates Due Process of Law.

2. Whether narrower and clearer scope of appeal waiver application to subsequent sentencing proceedings is required by Fifth Amendment Due Process.

3. Whether this Court's opinion in Loper Light Enterprises requires reconsideration of the "significant alteration" in the Congressionally designed sentencing system that was found to be unconstitutional in United States v. Booker.

Whether the near consensus determination by the various Circuits to accept appeal waivers in plea agreements that extend to subsequent sentencing proceedings violates Due Process of Law, and whether a narrower scope of appeal waiver application is required by Fifth Amendment Due Process