1) Is § 922(g)(1) unconstitutional as applied to an individual when he was a victim of a drive by shooting and has been convicted of a non-violent predicate offense, completed his sentence, and is not under supervision?

2) Whether a certificate of appealability should be issued to examine whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), as applied in this instance, violates the Second Amendment when reasonable jurists could disagree with the District Court's decision?

Is § 922(g)(1) unconstitutional as applied to an individual with a nonviolent conviction who was a victim of a drive-by shooting and seeks to possess a firearm for self-defense?