No. 25-48

Tarek Farag v. Climate United Fund, et al.

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2025-07-15
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: climate-change corruption-allegations fossil-fuel intervention-motion legal-standing scientific-evidence
Latest Conference: 2026-01-09 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

I. Did the District Court and Appellate Court err in denying petitioner's motion to intervene?

II. Did the District Court and Appellete Court err in failing to address petitioner's opposition to the Hoax?

III. Should a citizen have the right to prosecute law enforcement or public officials for alleged corruption?

IV. Courts should reduce the amount of paperwork.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the District Court and Appellate Court erred in denying petitioner's motion to intervene and addressing claims of a climate change 'hoax'

Docket Entries

2026-01-12
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-12-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
2025-10-28
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-08-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-08-08
Waiver of Federal Party of right to respond submitted.
2025-08-08
Waiver of right of respondent Federal Party to respond filed.
2025-07-21
Waiver of right of respondents California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank to respond filed.
2025-07-08

Attorneys

California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank
Diana Li KimCalifornia Department of Justice, Respondent
Federal Party
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
Illinois Finance Authority
Alex HemmerOffice of the Illinois Attorney General, Respondent
Tarek Farag
Tarek Farag — Petitioner