No. 25-375
CPC Patent Technologies Pty Ltd. v. Apple Inc.
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-review appellate-procedure federal-circuit patent-law rule-36 statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2025-11-07
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether Federal Circuit Rule 36, which allows the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to issue an affirmance without opinion when reviewing a decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board of the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO") violates the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 144, which requires that the Federal Circuit issue an "opinion" when reviewing a PTO decision.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Federal Circuit Rule 36 violates 35 U.S.C. § 144 by allowing affirmance without opinion when reviewing Patent Trial and Appeal Board decisions
Docket Entries
2025-11-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-10-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
2025-09-30
Waiver of right of respondent Apple Inc. to respond filed.
2025-09-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 30, 2025)
Attorneys
Apple Inc.
Brian Robert Matsui — Morrison & Foerster LLP, Respondent
CPC Patent Technologies Pty Ltd.
George Clark Summerfield Jr. — K&L Gates LLP, Petitioner