No. 25-350
Charles Brooks, et al. v. Jeremy James Allen
Tags: circuit-split grievance-process inmate-lawsuit mandatory-exhaustion prison-litigation-reform-act unexhausted-claims
Latest Conference:
2025-12-05
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
When a formerly incarcerated person amends a complaint filed while he was in prison and adds unexhausted claims, does the PLRA require dismissal of those claims?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When a formerly incarcerated person amends a complaint filed while he was in prison and adds unexhausted claims, does the PLRA require dismissal of those claims?
Docket Entries
2025-12-08
Petition DENIED.
2025-11-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/5/2025.
2025-11-14
Reply of Charles Brooks, et al. submitted.
2025-11-14
Reply of petitioners Charles Brooks, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2025-11-03
Brief of Jeremy Allen in opposition submitted.
2025-11-03
Brief of respondent Jeremy Allen in opposition filed.
2025-10-30
Amicus brief of Minnesota County Attorneys Association submitted.
2025-10-30
Brief amicus curiae of Minnesota County Attorneys Association filed.
2025-10-03
Response Requested. (Due November 3, 2025)
2025-10-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/17/2025.
2025-09-26
Waiver of Jeremy Allen of right to respond submitted.
2025-09-26
Waiver of right of respondent Jeremy Allen to respond filed.
2025-09-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 24, 2025)
2025-08-19
Application (25A186) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until September 19, 2025.
2025-08-07
Application (25A186) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 20, 2025 to September 19, 2025, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
Attorneys
Charles Brooks, et al.
Jeremy Allen
Mahesha Padmanabhan Subbaraman — Subbaraman PLLC, Respondent
Minnesota County Attorneys Association
Stephanie Anne Angolkar — Iverson Reuvers, Amicus