No. 25-334

Satyasheel S. Korpe v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-09-22
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: article-iii driving-while-intoxicated jury-trial probation-conditions second-amendment-rights sixth-amendment
Latest Conference: 2025-11-07
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Does the Sixth Amendment and Article III, Section 2, Clause 3 of the Constitution, guarantee a defendant charged with Driving While Intoxicated the right to a jury trial even when he faces only up to six months imprisonment?

2. Does the Sixth Amendment and Article III, Section 2, Clause 3 of the Constitution, guarantee a defendant charged with Driving While Intoxicated the right to a jury trial when he faces up to six months imprisonment and standard probationary conditions, which include loss of his Second Amendment right for a year?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the Sixth Amendment and Article III, Section 2, Clause 3 of the Constitution guarantee a defendant charged with Driving While Intoxicated the right to a jury trial when facing up to six months imprisonment and probationary conditions that include loss of Second Amendment rights?

Docket Entries

2025-11-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-10-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
2025-09-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-09-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 22, 2025)

Attorneys

Satyasheel Korpe
Chris LeibigLaw Office of Christopher Leibig, Petitioner
United States
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent