No. 25-322
Dimitry Kuperschmidt v. Jeff Angradi, Chief Probation Officer, et al.
Latest Conference:
2025-11-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Was the Pennsylvania appellate court rule on which the District Court relied to find procedural default a "firmly established" and "consistently followed" one within habeas precedent?
2. Can the "in custody" requirement ever be waived or excused?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the Pennsylvania appellate court rule on which the District Court relied to find procedural default a 'firmly established' and 'consistently followed' one within habeas precedent?
Docket Entries
2025-11-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-11-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/21/2025.
2025-09-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 20, 2025)
2025-07-22
Application (25A80) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until September 14, 2025.
2025-07-16
Application (25A80) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 16, 2025 to September 14, 2025, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
Dimitry Kuperschmidt
Michael James Confusione — Hegge & Confusione, Petitioner