No. 25-214
Kenneth Fitch, et al. v. Maryland, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: constitutional-discrimination healthcare-benefits medicare-part-d statutory-employment unilateral-contract unmistakability-doctrine
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity ERISA DueProcess
SocialSecurity ERISA DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2025-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the use of the unmistakability doctrine renders a fulfilled statutory unilateral employment contract illusory.
2. Whether Maryland may discriminate in favor of illegal aliens and against State retirees by providing subsidies for prescription drug benefits through Medicare Part D; and if so, whether the specific discriminatory provisions of the Qualified Residence Program in Maryland's Access to Care Act are unconstitutional.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the unmistakability doctrine renders a statutory unilateral employment contract illusory and whether Maryland's discriminatory healthcare provisions for illegal aliens violate constitutional protections
Docket Entries
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-08-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-08-21
Waiver of Maryland, et al. of right to respond submitted.
2025-08-21
Waiver of right of respondent Maryland, et al. to respond filed.
2025-08-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 22, 2025)
Attorneys
Kenneth Fitch, et al.
Deborah Ann Holloway Hill — Law Office of Deborah Hill, LLC, Petitioner
Maryland, et al.