No. 25-200
Kevin Salvador Golphin v. North Carolina
Response Waived
Tags: constitutional-law criminal-procedure eighth-amendment juvenile-sentencing life-without-parole sentencing-discretion
Latest Conference:
2025-10-10
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether North Carolina, in conflict with this Court's precedents and those of other states, has violated the Eighth Amendment by creating a de facto mandatory life-without-parole sentencing regime for juvenile offenders by invariably considering the facts of the juvenile's crime to be dispositive.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether North Carolina has violated the Eighth Amendment by creating a de facto mandatory life-without-parole sentencing regime for juvenile offenders by invariably considering the facts of the juvenile's crime to be dispositive
Docket Entries
2025-10-14
Petition DENIED.
2025-09-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/10/2025.
2025-09-16
Waiver of North Carolina of right to respond submitted.
2025-09-16
Waiver of right of respondent North Carolina to respond filed.
2025-08-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 18, 2025)
2025-06-11
Application (24A1175) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until August 16, 2025.
2025-05-29
Application (24A1175) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 17, 2025 to August 16, 2025, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Kevin Salvador Golphin
Eamon Paul Joyce — Petitioner
North Carolina
Heidi Michelle Williams — North Carolina Department of Justice, Respondent