No. 25-197
T. M. v. University of Maryland Medical System Corporation, et al.
Tags: appellate-procedure doctrine-interpretation federal-jurisdiction judicial-review rooker-feldman state-court
Latest Conference:
2025-12-05
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Rooker-Feldman doctrine can be triggered by a state-court decision that remains subject to further review in state court.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Rooker-Feldman doctrine can be triggered by a state-court decision that remains subject to further review in state court
Docket Entries
2026-02-20
Brief amici curiae of American Medical Association, et al. filed.
2026-02-20
Amicus brief of American Medical Association and Maryland State Medical Society submitted.
2026-02-19
Record received from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The record is electronic and is available on PACER.
2026-02-18
Sealed material received electronically from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and available with the Clerk. The remainder of the record is electronic and is available on PACER.
2026-02-18
Record requested from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
2026-02-13
Brief of University of Maryland Medical System Corporation, et al. submitted.
2026-02-13
Brief of respondents University of Maryland Medical System Corporation, et al. filed.
2026-02-11
Brief amicus curiae of Cyrus Sanai filed.
2026-02-11
Amicus brief of Cyrus Sanai submitted.
2026-02-11
SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, April 20, 2026.
2026-01-26
Motion for leave to file Volume I of the joint appendix with redactions and Volume II under seal GRANTED.
2026-01-22
Amicus brief of Cyrus Sanai submitted.
2026-01-21
Brief amicus curiae of Cyrus Sanai filed. (Corrected)
2026-01-21
Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed.
2026-01-21
Brief amici curiae of Federal Courts Scholars filed.
2026-01-21
Brief amicus curiae of Institute for Justice filed.
2026-01-21
Amicus brief of Constitutional Accountability Center submitted.
2026-01-21
Amicus brief of Institute for Justice submitted.
2026-01-14
Joint Appendix submitted.
2026-01-14
Brief of T.M. submitted.
2026-01-14
Motion For Leave To File The Joint Appendix Paritally Under Seal of T.M. submitted.
2026-01-14
Brief of petitioner T.M. filed.
2026-01-14
Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)
2026-01-14
Motion for leave to file Volume I of the joint appendix redacted and Volume II under seal.
2026-01-14
Motion for leave to file Volume I of the joint appendix with redactions and Volume II under seal filed.
2026-01-14
Joint appendix Volume I (redacted) filed. (Statement of costs filed)
2025-12-05
Petition GRANTED.
2025-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/5/2025.
2025-11-05
Reply of petitioner T.M. filed. (Distributed)
2025-11-05
Reply of T.M. submitted.
2025-11-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/21/2025.
2025-10-20
Brief of respondents University of Maryland Medical System Corporation, et al. in opposition filed.
2025-10-20
Brief of University of Maryland Medical System Corporation, et al. in opposition submitted.
2025-09-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 20, 2025.
2025-09-05
Motion of University of Maryland Medical System Corporation, et al. for an extension of time submitted.
2025-09-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 18, 2025 to October 20, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-08-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 18, 2025)
Attorneys
American Medical Association and Maryland State Medical Society
Jack R. Bierig — ArentFox Schiff LLP, Amicus
Constitutional Accountability Center
Cyrus Sanai
Federal Courts Scholars
Institute for Justice
Benjamin Andrew Field — Institute for Justice, Amicus
T.M.
University of Maryland Medical System Corporation, et al.
Lisa S. Blatt — Williams & Connolly LLP, Respondent