No. 25-171

Dimetri Alexander Smith v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-08-13
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: criminal-prosecution enterprise-structure legal-distinction procedural-requirement racketeering statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference: 2025-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

In a prosecution for racketeering related offenses, does the enterprise structure need to be distinct from that inherent in the racketeering activity alleged?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the enterprise structure need to be distinct from that inherent in the racketeering activity alleged?

Docket Entries

2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-08-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-08-20
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-08-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-07-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 12, 2025)

Attorneys

Dimetri Smith
William BreedloveBreedlove Legal LLC, Petitioner
United States
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent