(1) Whether the First Amendment Free Exercise
Clause provides an affirmative defense to tort liability
based solely on emotional distress damages with no
actual damages in the same manner as the Free
Speech Clause under Snyder v. Phelps , 562 U.S. 443
(2011) .

(2) Whether a government official stripped of
Eleventh Amendment immunity and sued in her
individual capacity based solely on emotional distress
damages with no actual damages is entitled to assert
individual capacity and personal First Amendment
defenses in the same or similar manner as any other
individual defendant like in Synder v. Phelps, 562
U.S. 443 (2011) , or does she stand before this Court
with no constitutional defenses or immunity
whatsoever.

(3) Whether Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644
(2015) , and the legal fiction of substantive due
process , should be overturned.

Whether the First Amendment Free Exercise Clause provides an affirmative defense to tort liability based solely on emotional distress damages with no actual damages, and whether a government official sued in her individual capacity is entitled to assert First Amendment defenses