No. 25-1141
Jason Tywann Bell v. John Gilley, Warden
Response Waived
Tags: career-offender-guideline habeas-corpus mootness residual-clause sentencing-enhancement suspension-clause
Latest Conference:
2026-05-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether, pursuant to United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36 (1950), this Court should vacate the court of appeals' judgment and remand with instructions to dismiss the case as moot.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether, pursuant to United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., this Court should vacate the court of appeals' judgment and remand with instructions to dismiss the case as moot when a federal prisoner completes his entire sentence after the court of appeals rejects his constitutional challenge to a sentence enhanced under an unconstitutionally vague residual clause
Docket Entries
2026-04-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/1/2026.
2026-04-09
Waiver of Gilley, John of right to respond submitted.
2026-04-09
Waiver of right of respondent Gilley, John to respond filed.
2026-03-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 1, 2026)
2026-01-14
Application (25A813) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until March 27, 2026.
2026-01-09
Application (25A813) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 26, 2026 to March 27, 2026, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Gilley, John
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
Jason Tywann Bell
Dana Kagan McGinley — Amold & Porter, Petitioner