No. 25-1109
Richard Gibson, et al. v. Cendyn Group, LLC, et al.
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: algorithmic-pricing antitrust-law price-fixing rule-of-reason sherman-act-section-1 vertical-agreements
Latest Conference:
2026-04-17
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether vertical licensing agreements between a common algorithmic pricing vendor and competing firms are categorically exempt from Section 1's rule-of-reason inquiry because the agreements do not expressly compel adherence to the software's pricing recommendations.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether vertical licensing agreements between a common algorithmic pricing vendor and competing firms are categorically exempt from Section 1's rule-of-reason inquiry because the agreements do not expressly compel adherence to the software's pricing recommendations
Docket Entries
2026-03-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2026.
2026-03-23
Waiver of Cendyn Group, LLC, et al. of right to respond submitted.
2026-03-23
Waiver of right of respondent Cendyn Group, LLC, et al. to respond filed.
2026-03-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 22, 2026)
Attorneys
Cendyn Group, LLC, et al.
Melissa Arbus Sherry — Latham & Watkins LLP, Respondent
Richard Gibson, et al.
Steve W. Berman — Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Petitioner