No. 25-1094
Charles Barrett v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: appellate-review evidentiary-admissibility federal-rules-of-evidence ninth-circuit prior-uncharged-conduct sexual-assault
Latest Conference:
2026-04-17
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit erred in allowing the government to admit evidence of prior uncharged allegations of sexual assault from three (3) different witnesses pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 413.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit erred in allowing the government to admit evidence of prior uncharged allegations of sexual assault from three different witnesses pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 413
Docket Entries
2026-04-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2026.
2026-03-27
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2026-03-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2026-03-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 17, 2026)
Attorneys
Barrett Charles
Donald B. Marks — Marks & Brooklier, APC, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent