Whether Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois, 431 U.S. 720 (1977), which bars antitrust claims by indirect purchasers and sellers, applies to a claim of "lost profit" damages based on indirect purchases or sales that were not made due to the alleged conspiracy.

Whether the allegation that businesses had an "opportunity to conspire," such as through joint lobbying and participation in a trade association, plausibly suggests an antitrust conspiracy.

Whether Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois bars antitrust claims by indirect purchasers based on lost profit damages from purchases not made due to alleged conspiracy, and whether allegations of opportunity to conspire through joint lobbying and trade association participation plausibly suggest an antitrust conspiracy