No. 25-1047
Triumph Foods, LLC, et al. v. Andrea J. Campbell, Attorney General of Massachusetts, et al.
Tags: constitutional-law dormant-commerce-clause express-preemption federal-meat-inspection-act federal-preemption implied-preemption
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the Act imposes additional or different —even if non -conflicting —requirements on pork producers, and is thus preempted by the FMIA under principles of express or implied preemption ?
2. Whether the Act violates the dormant Commerce Clause or the other constitutional doctrines sufficiently pleaded in the Complaint ?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Massachusetts's law imposing additional or different requirements on pork producers and processors is preempted by the Federal Meat Inspection Act under express or implied preemption doctrine, and whether the law violates the dormant Commerce Clause and other constitutional doctrines
Docket Entries
2026-03-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 3, 2026)
2025-12-31
Application (25A739) granted by Justice Jackson extending the time to file until March 2, 2026.
2025-12-19
Application (25A739) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 1, 2026 to March 2, 2026, submitted to Justice Jackson.
Attorneys
Triumph Foods, LLC, et al.
Michael Thomas Raupp — Husch Blackwell LLP, Petitioner