No. 25-1034
Adam J. Sherman v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: appellate-review complete-record-review criminal-procedure ineffective-assistance-of-counsel post-trial-hearings statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does statutory text imposing a duty for an appellate court to review the "entire record" require consideration of all the evidence from a post-trial fact finding hearing?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a statutory mandate requiring appellate courts to review the 'entire record' compels consideration of all evidence obtained at post-trial fact-finding hearings
Docket Entries
2026-03-04
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2026-03-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2026-02-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 1, 2026)
2025-12-19
Application (25A721) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until February 27, 2026.
2025-12-16
Application (25A721) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 29, 2025 to February 27, 2026, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Adam Sherman
Frederick James Johnson — Air Force Appellate Defense Division, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent