No. 25-101
J. M. F. v. Angel Quiros, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Correction
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: conflict-of-interest criminal-defendant effective-counsel legal-malpractice right-to-counsel sixth-amendment
Latest Conference:
2025-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the threat of a civil action by a criminal defendant against his attorney is a per se denial of the right to the effective of counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution, and thus does not require a defendant to make a showing of the attorney's deficient performance or prejudice in order to vacate his conviction.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the threat of a civil action by a criminal defendant against his attorney is a per se denial of the right to effective counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment
Docket Entries
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-08-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-08-14
Waiver of right of respondent Commissioner of Correction to respond filed.
2025-07-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 25, 2025)
Attorneys
Commissioner of Correction
Nathan James Buchok — Office of the Chief State's Attorney, Respondent
J.M.F.
Norman A. Pattis — Pattis & Smith, LLC, Petitioner