Whether the Fifth and Sixth Amendments required a jury to find that Mr. Fields's prior convictions were separately brought and tried and arose out of separate and distinct criminal episodes before his sentence could be enhanced under Colorado's habitual-criminal statute, in light of this Court's decision in Erlinger v. United States, 144 S. Ct. 1840 (2024).

Whether the Sixth Amendment requires a jury, rather than a judge, to determine whether a defendant's prior convictions arose from separate criminal episodes for purposes of imposing a habitual offender sentence enhancement