No. 24A658

Martin Akerman v. Warden

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-01-02
Status: Denied
Type: A
Experienced Counsel
Tags: due-process federal-jurisdiction habeas-corpus judicial-review ninth-circuit writ-of-mandamus
Latest Conference: 2025-02-28
Question Presented (from Petition)

Did the Ninth Circuit err in dismissing the habeas petition despite evidence satisfying the custody requirement under 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(1)?

Is closure of the case appropriate while related proceedings in the Federal Circuit and District Court remain unresolved?

Should this Court exercise its original jurisdiction to address Applicant's claims under 28 U.S.C. § 2241?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Ninth Circuit violated due process by prematurely dismissing a habeas corpus petition and barring further filings without addressing related ongoing proceedings

Docket Entries

2025-03-03
Application (24A658) denied by the Court.
2025-02-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2025.
2025-02-12
Application (24A658) referred to the Court.
2025-01-04
Application (24A658) refiled and submitted to The Chief Justice.
2025-01-03
Application (24A658) denied by Justice Kagan.
2024-12-23
Application (24A658) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

Martin Akerman
Martin Akerman — Petitioner