No. 24A65

Tina Peters v. Daniel P. Rubinstein, et al.

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-07-19
Status: Denied
Type: A
Experienced Counsel
Tags: election-records federal-immunity fourteenth-amendment privileges-or-immunities state-prosecution supremacy-clause
Latest Conference: N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether issues related to a claim to immunity from state prosecution under the Supremacy Clause and the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment are reserved exclusively for adjudication by a federal court.

2. Whether the right to immunity from state prosecution for actions reasonably taken to comply with a duty imposed by federal law protects only current federal employees and individuals in state custody.

3. Whether the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment provides a citizen of the United States with the right to participate in the administration of the laws of the United States by taking actions reasonably necessary to comply with those laws and to the right to be immunized against state prosecution for such actions.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a state official can claim immunity from state prosecution for actions taken in good faith to preserve federal election records under federal law

Docket Entries

2024-07-22
Application (24A65) denied by Justice Gorsuch.
2024-07-17
Application (24A65) for writ of injunction, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.

Attorneys

Tina Peters
Patrick Michael McSweeneyMcSweeney, Cynkar & Kachouroff, PLLC, Petitioner