No. 24A419

Cynthia Davis, Warden v. David M. Smith

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: N/A
Status: Denied
Type: A
Experienced Counsel
Tags: criminal-conviction federal-review habeas-corpus mandate sixth-circuit state-court
Latest Conference: N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)

Question not identified.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Sixth Circuit improperly interpreted federal habeas corpus standards for reviewing state court criminal convictions

Docket Entries

2024-11-22
Application (24A419) referred to the Court.
2024-11-22
Application (24A419) for stay and recall of the mandate presented to Justice Kavanaugh and by him referred to the Court is denied.
2024-11-12
Response to application from respondent David M. Smith filed.
2024-11-04
Response to application (24A419) requested by Justice Kavanaugh, due by 4 p.m. (EST), on November 12, 2024.
2024-10-24
Application (24A419) for a stay and recall of the mandate, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.

Attorneys

Cynthia Davis, Warden
Thomas Elliot GaiserOffice of the Ohio Attorney General, Petitioner
David M. Smith
Sarah Marie KonskyJenner & Block Supreme Court and Appellate Clinic, Respondent