Whether the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals violated Robert Leslie Roberson III's constitutional rights to due process and a meaningful opportunity to be heard by dismissing his application for habeas relief based on changed science without reviewing the merits of his claims, despite substantial new evidence of his actual innocence and the availability of state law procedures designed to address precisely such circumstances.

Whether a state court's refusal to review new scientific evidence challenging a capital conviction based on now-discredited forensic theories violates a defendant's due process rights and actual innocence claims