Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in holding that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act's plain meaning does not apply to a disposition of government real property, and instead adopting a novel interpretation of "substantial burden" that conflicts with RFRA's text, this Court's precedent, and decisions of other circuits.

Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in holding that Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Ass'n forecloses Applicant's Free Exercise Clause claim, even though the government's act of singling out Oak Flat was not generally applicable.

Whether the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) and Free Exercise Clause protect Native American religious sites from government-authorized destruction that prevents religious practices