1. Whether a delay of 105 days by Judge Noel Eason Primos in responding to a
court letter, which mandated a determination for oral argument within 5 days,
constitutes a failure of due process.

2. Whether the imposition of cruel and unusual punishment constitutes an
exceptional circumstance that deviates significantly from accepted standards of
decency and fairness, thereby warranting deviation from standard legal procedures.

3. Whether fraud upon the court constitutes an exceptional circumstance.

4. Whether it is permissible under postal regulations to use a docket number in
place of the addressee's address on mail.

5. Whether the collection of +300% interest on a judgment under Delaware law,
which disfavors compound interest, constitutes cruel and unusual punishment.

6. Whether a judgment should be validated in the absence of valid proof if the
judgment numbers are inconsistent.

7. Whether it is permissible for a judge to attend a hearing without adequate
preparation.

8. On what legal grounds does the Secretary of State serve as the registered agent
for an unaccredited subprime lending company?

9. Whether the designation of a governmental entity as a registered agent confers
governmental entity status upon the corporation.

10. Whether a governmental entity bears equivalent responsibility if the
corporation it represents commits fraud.

11. Whether the deprivation of constitutional rights constitutes exceptional
circumstances.

Whether a 105-day delay by a judge in responding to a court letter constitutes a failure of due process