No. 24-965
Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Shirley Weber, California Secretary of State
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3)
Latest Conference:
2025-10-10
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Ninth Circuit undermine free speech protections when it found that a retaliatory action is independent from an action that could chill a person of ordinary firmness from engaging in protected speech?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Ninth Circuit undermine free speech protections when it found that a retaliatory action is independent from an action that could chill a person of ordinary firmness from engaging in protected speech?
Docket Entries
2025-10-14
Petition DENIED.
2025-10-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/10/2025.
2025-09-26
Rescheduled.
2025-09-05
Reply of Judicial Watch, Inc. submitted.
2025-09-05
Reply of petitioner Judicial Watch, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
2025-07-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-06-13
Brief of Shirley Weber in opposition submitted.
2025-06-13
Brief of respondent Shirley Weber, California Secretary of State in opposition filed.
2025-04-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 13, 2025.
2025-04-25
Motion of Shirley Weber for an extension of time submitted.
2025-04-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 14, 2025 to June 13, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-04-14
Response Requested. (Due May 14, 2025)
2025-03-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2025.
2025-03-20
Waiver of right of respondent Shirley Weber to respond filed.
2025-03-11
Supplemental Brief of Judicial Watch, Inc. submitted.
2025-03-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 7, 2025)
Attorneys
Judicial Watch, Inc.
Michael Bekesha — Judicial Watch, Inc., Petitioner
Shirley Weber
Anna Theresa Ferrari — California Department of Justice, Respondent
Diana Li Kim — California Department of Justice, Respondent