No. 24-946

Olympic Collection, Inc., et al. v. Aklilu Yohannes

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-03-04
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: certiorari-review constitutional-claim due-process garnishment-writ interlocutory-order state-action
Latest Conference: 2025-04-25
Related Cases: 24-833 (Vide)
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether Petitioner Akilu Yohannes's ("Yohannes") challenge to an interlocutory order provides a basis for certiorari.

Whether certiorari should be granted where considerations governing review on certiorari under Rule 10 have not been met.

Whether Olympic is a private collection agency that is not a state actor for purposes of a due process claim.

Whether an as-applied due process claim can be brought based on an alleged failure to follow a state statute.

Whether this lawsuit should be dismissed if the sole remaining claim is dismissed.

Whether the Court should grant certiorari on cross-petition to determine to answer the above questions.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether an interlocutory order and failure to meet Rule 10 considerations warrant certiorari review

Docket Entries

2025-04-28
Petition DENIED.
2025-04-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/25/2025.
2025-03-18
Waiver of right of respondent Aklilu Yohannes to respond filed.
2025-02-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 3, 2025)

Attorneys

Aklilu Yohannes
Aklilu Yohannes — Respondent
Olympic Collection, Inc.
Marc RosenbergLee, Smart, PS, Inc., Petitioner