1. Did the 10th Circuit err in its application of the
Rooker-Feldman Doctrine given that the 4th circuit, in
Gibson v. Goldston, No. 22-1757 (4th Cir 2023) and the
11th Circuit, in Behr v. Campbell , No. 18-12842 (11th
Cir. 2021), have issued conflicting opinions in their
orders as to the limits of expansion and application of
Rooker-Feldman as a basis for Rule 12(b)(1) Motion to
Dismiss when state agents (i.e. State District Court
Judges) acting under color of law violate a litigants
constitutional rights?

2. Did the 10th Circuit err in its application of
the 11th Amendment by granting and affirming the
Defendants Rule 12(b)(1) Motion to Dismiss when state
agents (i.e. State District Court Judges) acting under
color of law claiming to be in their official judicial
capacity violated the litigant 's constitutional rights,
see Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232 (1974)?

Did the 10th Circuit err in its application of the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine and 11th Amendment when state agents acting under color of law allegedly violated a litigant's constitutional rights?