No. 24-912

Earl Casperson Meggison v. Florida

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2025-02-25
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived Experienced Counsel
Tags: constitutional-law criminal-procedure ex-post-facto removal-provision sex-offender-registration state-courts
Latest Conference: 2025-04-17
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the Court should resolve the following question for which the state courts are split: is it a violation of constitutional ex post facto principles to apply the current – and more onerous – removal provision of a state's sex offender registration statute to a petitioner seeking removal from the registry.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Court should resolve the question of whether applying a more onerous sex offender registration removal provision violates ex post facto constitutional principles

Docket Entries

2025-04-21
Petition DENIED.
2025-03-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2025.
2025-03-24
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2025-02-20
2025-01-15
Application (24A695) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until February 20, 2025.
2025-01-10
Application (24A695) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 20, 2025 to February 20, 2025, submitted to Justice Thomas.

Attorneys

Earl Casperson Meggison
Michael Robert UffermanMichael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner
Florida
Kristen Lynn DavenportSuite 500, Respondent