No. 24-912
Earl Casperson Meggison v. Florida
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: constitutional-law criminal-procedure ex-post-facto removal-provision sex-offender-registration state-courts
Latest Conference:
2025-04-17
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Court should resolve the following question for which the state courts are split: is it a violation of constitutional ex post facto principles to apply the current – and more onerous – removal provision of a state's sex offender registration statute to a petitioner seeking removal from the registry.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court should resolve the question of whether applying a more onerous sex offender registration removal provision violates ex post facto constitutional principles
Docket Entries
2025-04-21
Petition DENIED.
2025-03-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2025.
2025-03-24
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2025-02-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 27, 2025)
2025-01-15
Application (24A695) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until February 20, 2025.
2025-01-10
Application (24A695) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 20, 2025 to February 20, 2025, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Earl Casperson Meggison
Michael Robert Ufferman — Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner
Florida
Kristen Lynn Davenport — Suite 500, Respondent