No. 24-907
DeShaun L. Wells v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: article-134 constitutional-law military-courts military-justice service-discredit uniform-code-military-justice
Latest Conference:
2025-03-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether Clause 2 of Article 134, UCMJ, is unconstitutional.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Clause 2 of Article 134, UCMJ, is unconstitutional
Docket Entries
2025-03-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-03-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/21/2025.
2025-03-03
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-03-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-02-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 26, 2025)
2024-12-05
Application (24A520) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until February 21, 2025.
2024-11-21
Application (24A520) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 23, 2024 to February 21, 2025, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
DeShaun Wells, et al.
United States
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent